00:44:42 ER has joined #einsteinianroulette
00:59:02 ER has quit [Read error: Connection reset by peer]
01:21:25 ER has joined #einsteinianroulette
01:30:52 ER has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
03:03:46 ER has joined #einsteinianroulette
03:11:02 ER has quit [Ping timeout: 246 seconds]
03:32:14 ER has joined #einsteinianroulette
04:50:59 syv has joined #einsteinianroulette
05:56:50 syv: No idea what the apology is for?
05:57:53 Devastator: was off IRC for a bit.
05:58:18 ER: not nearly as much as we are highly regularly!
06:02:44 syv: As you always point out, IRC works fine for asynchronous conversation. If I have something to say, I'll say it and get a response later. Or send a PM
06:03:11 Devastator: I'ma gonna roll for Lonely Sands.
06:03:38 syv: Was tempted to ask for that, actually
06:04:07 Devastator: Inigo's +1 and Xin's +3 shouldn't count.
06:04:21 Devastator: Immorality doesn't make you harder to touch.
06:04:58 Devastator: So wound rolls will be at scrach, but a -1 or a -3 will be needed to cause permanent harm.
06:05:36 syv: Xin is at a huge disadvantage, but he doesn't particularly mind.
06:08:34 Devastator: Xin normally has +2.
06:08:52 Devastator: I'm gonna dock that to +1 without the big sword. It's not a huge penalty, as the off-hand weapon is a normal part of the style.
06:09:19 Devastator: I am going to say that Inigo suffers more from not having the proper weapon, but that drops him from +5 to +3.
06:09:38 syv: Eh? He doesn't have the proper weapon?
06:09:47 Devastator: Yeah, he's not using his rapier.
06:09:50 ER: he's using a fencing dagger
06:11:08 Devastator: I'll also say 'first touch' is a wound roll under a net of 6.
06:11:18 Devastator: above that is a dodge.
06:12:07 Devastator: I should adjust a bit more because you aren't trying to kill each other. Call it -3 and -5 to cause a less impermanent wound, instead of -1 and -3.
06:12:27 Devastator: that's enough numbers.
06:13:08 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 2 <Total: 2(+3) = 5>
06:13:15 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 7 <Total: 7(+1) = 8>
06:13:26 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 8 <Total: 8(+1) = 9>
06:13:27 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 7 <Total: 7(+3) = 10>
06:13:45 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 4 <Total: 4(+3) = 7>
06:13:46 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 6 <Total: 6(+1) = 7>
06:14:06 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 6 <Total: 6>
06:14:21 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 10 <Total: 10(+1) = 11>
06:14:24 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 7 <Total: 7(+3) = 10>
06:14:30 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 12 <Total: 12>
06:15:16 Devastator: Miss, parry. Hit, high parry. Lunge, partial deflection, very close dodge.
06:15:38 Devastator: Beautiful strike by Xin, almost parried, dodged perfectly.
06:15:53 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 10 <Total: 10(+2) = 12>
06:15:58 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 5 <Total: 5(+1) = 6>
06:16:04 GameServ: Syntax: XdY [ {-|+|*|/} Z ]
06:16:10 GameServ:
Devastator rolled 1d12: 1 <Total: 1(-2) = -1>
06:18:05 Devastator: (I did screw up a little. Should have granted Xin initiative with those orders.
06:33:23 syv: I was originally gonna have Xin ask for a second round, maybe after bers started to kick in, but that showcased his style pretty well.
06:33:43 syv: Would he get a bers bonus for round two?
06:33:45 Devastator: "Immorality doesn't make you harder to touch."
06:34:03 Devastator: Maybe? I'd have to adjust the wound to hurt ratio by two points.
06:34:16 Devastator: if you want a bonus from losing control, can't really hold back as much.
06:34:47 Devastator: I could also have Yi get involved.
06:34:53 syv: I kinda want to just to show that Xin's a berserker. Maybe show off some of his *actual* immortality.
06:35:09 Devastator: you can always voluntarily remove your head or something. ;-p
06:35:30 syv: Underhanded tactic: throw head
06:35:46 Devastator: I might give you an aim penalty. ;-p
06:37:22 Devastator: Bers just doesn't seem that suited for 'to the touch' duels.
06:39:18 Devastator: Blood for the Blood God!
06:40:53 Devastator: I'll move on to the next land as soon as they're done,
ER. Shouldn't be much longer.
06:46:21 Devastator: and we could watch more Steins;Gate
06:46:54 Devastator: or you could update bird.
06:47:19 ER: I'm too bust watching youtube~
06:49:27 Devastator: Man, I remember when you could theoretically watch all of youtube.
06:57:51 Devastator: removing dislikes isn't dumb at all.
06:59:22 Devastator: they serve no useful purpose.
07:00:16 syv: I'm sorry, they don't? Videos having a ton of dislikes doesn't communicate anything?
07:00:31 Devastator: No, not really. It means it got hatespammed somewhere.
07:00:47 Devastator: with very few exceptions.
07:01:51 syv: Frankly, the times I've noticed a high number of dislikes, there were definitely problems with the video.
07:02:11 syv: "A large group of people hated this" is meaningful.
07:02:42 syv: You might agree with the haters or disagree, but it does communicate information.
07:03:28 syv: ...That guy sounds like
Dev
07:03:36 Devastator: Not my accent at all.
07:04:00 syv: You have a very distinct and unusual accent, and that's definitely much closer to yours than to mine.
07:05:55 Devastator: but nah, you need context to make thumbs down counts meaningful. One vid having a ton of them out of the blue doesn't mean anything. One vid being worse next to others can do that.. but you can get that info from thumbs up counts.
07:08:44 syv: In my opinion it's different. I high number of dislikes--or rather, a high ratio of dislikes--tells you to think critically about what you're watching. "Wait, a bunch of people dislike this. Why?"
07:09:38 syv: Maybe it was brigaded. I'll be confused that it's hated, and might look up whatever controversy happened. Maybe they said something really controversial and flawed. It deserves to be looked at closer.
07:10:02 syv: Removing dislikes removes that, and I don't see how it's a *beneficial* change.
07:11:16 syv: Dislike counts aren't useful for telling how "good" a video is, that's likes and views. They're for telling you how many people were upset by it.
07:22:40 Devastator: apparently they made another matrix movie.
07:26:10 syv: Does it star John Wick again?
07:26:20 Devastator: It's apparently really weird.
07:27:23 Devastator: RLM did a vid on it. They're spending like half the time talking about how awesome Matrix Original Flavor was.
07:27:29 Devastator: Which it was, really.
07:28:07 ER: a video convinced me that 2 and 3 are probably good too
07:28:17 ER: if both watched in a row at least
07:28:40 Devastator: they could be worse.
09:45:07 syv: The capacity for knowledge that the human brain possesses is truly remarkable
09:45:27 syv: And holy shit so much of what I have stored in here is utterly useless
09:46:04 ER: I have forgotten so so much more than I actually know :p
12:57:16 sy has joined #einsteinianroulette
13:01:00 syv has quit [Ping timeout: 248 seconds]
22:33:46 parisbre56[Away] has joined #einsteinianroulette
22:33:46 Topic for #einsteinianroulette: Fleshorrors dream of feline BASS
22:33:46 Topic set by syv [Saturday 22 May 2021, 04:44:55]
23:28:48 ER has joined #einsteinianroulette
Log file '2022-02-12.log' ends.
17804 bytes processed.